Ram ProMaster City

Ram ProMaster City

About Ram ProMaster City

After decades of decades-old van designs, the American market is finally getting something new, modern and very European. Ram’s ProMaster City compact van for 2017 is actually known around the world as the Fiat Doblo, but it works just as well here. A real contender capable of taking on Ford’s Transit Connect and the Nissan NV200, the compact ProMaster City van delivers the best payload and cargo capacity in the segment. The ProMaster City is equipped with a fairly large cargo bay that can be configured to carry all forms of cargo or, unlike the NV200, three passengers. Powered by a 178-horsepower 4-cylinder engine, the ProMaster City is more powerful than the Nissan NV200 and Chevy City Express, but it also costs significantly more.

View Ram ProMaster City vehicles for sale near you.

Select a Year

(3 available)
2017 Ram ProMaster City
What's new for 2017?
2017 Ram ProMaster City

Changes for 2017 are relatively minor. The compact Ram ProMaster City van receives brighter illumination around its shifter and rear-door reflectors for improved visibility.

2016 Ram ProMaster City
What's new for 2016?
2016 Ram ProMaster City

Ram added minor changes to the 2016 ProMaster City. All radios now get Bluetooth, and the carpet is a little thicker both for comfort and improved noise suppression. Ram has also upgraded the tires, improving performance and rolling resistance to help aid fuel economy without sacrificing the ProMaster's handling.

2015 Ram ProMaster City
What's new for 2015?
2015 Ram ProMaster City

The Ram ProMaster City is based on Fiat’s Doblo, which has just embarked on its third generation in European markets, where it has had a long and successful run. This is its first appearance in North America.

Advertisement

Consumer Reviews

Not a good investment for new small business

By on Friday, February 2, 2018

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 820

10 1.0
overall rating 1 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
1/10
Value
1/10
Reliability
1/10
Quality
1/10
Performance
2/10
Styling
9/10
Comfort
5/10

Pros: "great design"

Cons: "Chrysler/Fiat quality"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 1

"Own it for 40 days (820 miles) more then 20 days in service department .5 attempts to solve multiple mechanical issues . Case managers with Chrysler resolution team not responding for more then a week. Before you buying give yourself a favor and research online :what is the car manufacturer with a lowest reliability rating and make the decision after . If you buying anyway take two so you can use one while second in service department ."

2 people out of 2 found this review helpful

Daily driver, camper and occaisional cargo hauler

By on Tuesday, November 1, 2016

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 6,000

10 10.0
overall rating 10 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
10/10
Value
10/10
Reliability
10/10
Quality
10/10
Performance
9/10
Styling
10/10
Comfort
9/10

Pros: "price, economy, versatile, features"

Cons: "tranny a bit clunky, but still feels solid"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 10

"I got a smoking deal on this van $20500 Canadian dollars. I get great fuel economy and it has all the power I need. I bought this to create my own VW Microbus camper that I could use every day. I love it. The only criticism is the tranny can shift a little clunky due to the shifting dogs in the 9spd. The throttle can hesitate while it hunts for a gear. The ZF transmission is known for this, but it doesn't seem to effect it's reliability; it is more of a characteristic of how it shifts. It rides well and is very configurable. I got such a great deal on it. If drives nice, but the seats are just so-so. Handles well for a van and has lots of options for a cargo van. I hit an eagle on a trip and it dented the roof. I live in hail country so I hope I never get hit by that. I got a great deal on it, but I'd have gladly spent $2000 more just to get the same vehicle."

27 people out of 34 found this review helpful

Nothing fancy, very competent.

By on Friday, December 22, 2017

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 4,000

10 9.0
overall rating 9 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
9/10
Value
10/10
Reliability
8/10
Quality
8/10
Performance
9/10
Styling
8/10
Comfort
9/10

Pros: "Value, handling, relatively quiet."

Cons: "Cup holder location, horn beeps with remote lock."

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 9

"I have owned the (standard passenger version) City for about 5 months. Sticker price was about 26.5k, I paid about 21k total, including 7% tax. THINGS I DONT LIKE-- First gear can kind of surge, particularly when its cold. No spare tire unless you order as an option. Standard stereo not very good.The cup holders are not placed well.The horn beeps when you use the clicker to lock the car and there seems to be no easy way to disable this feature. THINGS I LIKE-- Best value. For the last half of 2017, Ram has been discounting the price of the City thru incentives much more than Ford has on the Transit. Relatively quiet, not luxury car quiet, but for a passenger capable cargo van, noise is not an issue. Responsive steering, handles well for a van, and good viability. Comfortable seats. Large, tall cargo area that has a low floor for easy access. Split rear seats fold forward easily. Gas mileage has been about 24 mpg in mostly suburban driving."

3 people out of 4 found this review helpful

Advertisement
Thanks for Supporting
Kelley Blue Book.
We deliver up-to-date car values, expert reviews and unbiased reporting at no
cost to you. To do this, we display ads from only trusted automotive partners.

To continue on our site, simply turn off your ad blocker and refresh the page.