The 2015 Chrysler 200 sedan is all-new and brings a more refined interior and new sheet metal crinkles. Other notable features include Lane Departure Warning Plus, Advanced Brake Assist and Full Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus, all of which are optional.
The 2013 Chrysler 200 receives only modest changes, with the popular S trim remade as a package for the Touring and Limited trims. A new 5-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty backs the 200, and the convertible gets an upgraded suspension for a more engaging driving experience.
While the 2012 Chrysler 200's Sebring roots are still evident in its profile, it's a new experience from the driver's seat. The front-wheel drive sedan's strong 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 nearly matches the efficiency of the entry 2.4-liter 4-cylinder, handling is crisp, and the cabin offers a premium feel. After such a drastic transformation for 2011, little is changed for 2012.
In the midsize sedan segment lurk industry-leading stalwarts like the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry and Nissan Altima, but the 2015 Chrysler 200 is no longer a 2nd-class citizen. In fact, it's not even remotely mistakable for the 1st-generation 200 model it's replacing. Gone are the days where you can get a 200 convertible, but it was the last (and only) holdout from the midsize segment to let go. The front-wheel-drive 200 offers a choice of two engines – a 4-cylinder for fuel-economy and a V6 for fun. The new 9-speed automatic transmission contributes to a smooth ride and respectable fuel figures as well. All-wheel drive is available on 200S and 200C models.
By Pilotguy121a on Sunday, September 07, 2014
I own this car - My approximate mileage is 400overall rating 10 of 10rating details
Pros: "Powerful, fuel efficient, sharp looks, great tech"
Cons: "Stock tires are alright"
Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 10
"I was in the market for a car that had a balance between power, sportiness, fuel economy, and either FWD or AWD. My search started with a Dodge Dart GT. It was a roomy, comfy, car with a go-kart feel. However, its fuel mileage and lack of power left me disappointed. Then I test drove a VW Jetta GLI. Quick, nimble, but closed in and small. Fuel mileage was alright. Price for a used one is around $26,000 (with options). Then I test drove a 200C FWD V6. I owned a Dodge Avenger R/T, which shares the same platform as the Sebring/200. However, this 2015 car is a complete overhaul. The only thing that carried over was the name and the engine (tuned to achieve 12 more hp over the 2014 model year). I test drove a FWD 200C V6, I love the way that this car is put together. The amount of refinement over the 2008-2014 years is unbelievable. I did end up purchasing a 200C AWD, in Granite Crystal Metallic with the linen leather interior. It has the premium light group, nav/sound (8.9" UConnect system), and the comfort group (ventilated seats). Interior wise, the car is very sharp. The leather is very soft and the seats are comfortable. Both heating and cooling of the seats is controlled with the UConnect touch screen. They can be programmed to turn on with the remote start system or when the engine is powered on. The gauge cluster features two analogue dials (Tachometer and Speedometer, they are labeled, which is kinda silly and one high-resolution display. The display is programmable. You can set it to display certain parameters in certain areas of the screen. It is very easy to use. The navigation system is powered by Garmin. It is integrated into the main screen and will display when to turn on the instrument cluster. Again, this is an extremely easy to use, intuitive, system. I only have a 2011 CTS nav/entertainment system to compare it to, but it isn't much of a comparison. The Cadillac's system is old, clunky, and hard to use. On the highway, the cabin is very quiet. The only thing you can hear is tire noise thanks to the budget Bridgestone's that come stock. Overall, I am very pleased with the refinement, storage, comfort, and ease of use with regards to the settings/UConnect system. The rotary shifter is also a novel idea and functions perfectly. It does throw off people at first as they don't know where the shift lever has gone. The Alpine sound system is clear, loud, and high quality. Exterior wise, the car is very sharp. The paint looks great in the sun and the body lines of the car are noticeable but not vulgar. Headlights are bright and high-beams are also great. The fog lights are LED and surprisingly bright and focused. Tailights take from the Charger/Dart and are LED but not across the whole trunk. They are reminiscent of an Audi A7 but look aggressive. Exhaust is molded into the rear bumper and lined with chrome, similar to the Ford Fusion Titanium (a car similar to this one). Performance wise, the V6 is throaty, smooth, and powerful. It is however, not fuel thirsty. I recorded a 31MPG on a 60 mile highway trip. I expect it to improve as the engine breaks in. The car has plenty of power and with the AWD system active, there is no torque steer or wheel spin. In the corners, the AWD is more sturdy than its FWD sibling. The 9-Speed transmission is quick and allows for 65mph at 1400RPM (in 8th gear, 9th gear drops it to nearly 1200RPM, which is too low to maintain it in 9th gear). In Sport mode AWD is always active. The trans shifts later and slightly quicker. Using the paddle shifters is easy, though the software needs to learn your driving habits or you will get double down shifts (one that the computer does and one that you do but the computer beats you to it). Steering is smooth and easy around town but not totally numb. On the highway, the steering becomes heavy, which I view as a good thing. Overall, very pleased with the performance aspect of this car. That ends my review. So far the car is fantastic. In my opinion, it is better than its competitors and for a price that is often less. An AWD V6 car with this much tech and this good of fuel economy for under $30K is hard to come by. This fulfills all my needs and I expect it to keep exceeding all my expectations."
44 people out of 48 found this review helpful
By Matt on Sunday, August 10, 2014
I own this car - My approximate mileage is 100overall rating 9 of 10rating details
Pros: "gas mileage, options, quality, reliability."
Cons: "lacking in power, smallish backseat."
Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 9
"Ok first of all this is just a beautiful car! I opted to go with the vivid pearl blue, with the black premium cloth linen interior and the comfort/convienience group add-on with the moon roof. I ended up choosing the limited based on the price (msrp with options for mine was $27,380)and the gas mileage with the 2.4 multiair engine vs. the pentastar v6. The car definately drives like a 4 cylinder however the 9 speed transmission is very smoothe and delivers excellent gas mileage for this class ( close to 36 highway/24 city/combined 28 mpg). If you aim for luxery interior options, oh boy, this car is for you. With the interior resembling that of an airplane cockpit, there is enough goodies and gadgets to make ya smile, including an awesome rotery e-shift. Plenty of storage, and enough space for most backseat passengers, slightly lacking on the headroom and still VERY comfortable. My overall opinion on the car is very positive, with the only smudge comming from the fact that I couldn't afford a fully equiped 200c with AWD given that I live in Nebraska. Given that I fully believe the LImited's and 200s's (with the 2.4 liter engines) will be the volume sellers for the great fuel economy and overall interior features, along with Chryslers reliability. Cheers!!"
29 people out of 37 found this review helpful
By CoolCat on Sunday, September 14, 2014
I own this car - My approximate mileage is 2,500overall rating 10 of 10rating details
Pros: "Great Price for luxury"
Cons: "more back seat space"
Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 10
"I own the 200s model with all the options for about 3 months and I love it. Great style good MPG and people just starred at the car every time on the streets. The color is crystal gray metallic with the 19inch hyper-black wheels. I decided to go with the 4cyl because of the fuel economy but I tested the awd 6cyl and the power difference is noticeable but the 4cyl is pretty quick in S mode and it gets better MPG."
16 people out of 21 found this review helpful