Kelley Blue Book


HomeBuickBuick Skylark1994 Buick Skylark
Consumer Reviews

1994 Buick Skylark Consumer Reviews

Save this car
Write a Review
4.0
(87 reviews)
1994 Buick Skylark
5
37%
4
40%
3
15%
2
6%
1
2%
85%
Recommend this vehicle
Value
4.3
Performance
4.3
Quality
4.2
Comfort
4.3
Reliability
4.4
Styling
4.1
1994 Skylark Overview
Among the 87 owners who provided feedback on the 1994 Buick Skylark for Kelley Blue Book, consumer sentiment is mostly positive, with 85% recommending the vehicle. As a whole, consumers found the vehicle's reliability and comfort to be its strongest features and styling to be its weakest. 35 out of 87 of owners (40% of them) rank the 1994 Skylark four out of five stars. Overall, consumers seem aligned in their opinions of the 1994 Buick Skylark. Is it the right vehicle for for you? Check out Kelley Blue Book's consumer reviews and see for yourself.
Build & Price

Most Helpful Reviews

Positive Review

"Good car for the money"

I bough this car in 2008 with 69000 miles for under two grand. I have had to replace the starter once, the muffler a couple of times, the coil pack and the brake lines (that was pricey). The power window motors are sometimes a little iffy but I've never had to replace any of them. Other than that it has been a tremendous vehicle, I have never had to worry about it breaking down or not starting. The interior isn't fancy but I like it and the seats are comfortable. It doesn't accelerate fast but it handles very well. It sits fairly low to the ground so you have to watch out for steep driveways and the like. This car is notorious for having bad head gaskets which usually renders the car useless somewhere between eighty and one-hundred twenty thousand miles. I have actually had the head gasket on my vehicle looked at and they told me it looked fine, so I guess I'm one of the lucky ones. My car has already exceeded its "life expectancy" but I think that's pretty rare. You don't see many on the road any more because of the head gasket problem; that's why I wouldn't recommend the vehicle to anyone else.


VS

Critical Review

"Good"

Have a 1992 model with 3.3 V6 and 135000 miles on it (owned it since 1994). Problems here and there over the years with alternator, cooling fan, and fuel sensors. Body paint had to be replaced 8 years ago and it has minimal rust. But, considering its age and having driven it across country twice, and driven it in the heat of Tucson and the cold of New England, it has stood up well overall.

1994 Skylark Reviews

In our commitment to delivering the most comprehensive assessment of the vehicle possible, KBB.com widens the scope of our reviews to include all pertinent model years.
ex. Dependable

Showing 8 of 87 reviews.


Carlos
1/26/2021
Runs good better than bus
Pros

Better then bus

Cons

Get go places

Service ingien lights on heater on off

Value
5.0
Performance
3.0
Quality
3.0
Comfort
3.0
Reliability
3.0
Styling
3.0
Was this review helpful?
0
1

Misterbuick1995
2/3/2017
Great car for its class and size
Pros

Great gas mileage and solid body and frame

Cons

a bit cramped, and could use a bit more power

I bought my 1997 Buick Skylark Limited for 450 with 235000 miles on it. About 180k of those were freeway/highway miles, and since freeway driving doesnt do much wear to your car, in actuality the car has more like 55-60K city miles on it. The interior is a tad cramped getting into it but comfortable once you get seated. Mine came with the Oldsmobile LD9 2.4L Twin-Cam Straight 4 engine and it runs like a champ and gets roughly 26 mph in the city and up to 32 mph on the freeway! It could use a tad more than the 150 HP it produces, but all in all it gets her going pretty swiftly for a 4-banger engine. I put about 400 worth of repairs into it including replacing the radio, and some mechanical problems (the previous owner messed up the front right wheel bearing, the passenger mirror, and heater core) but other than that I havent had to do anything but routine maintenance. The car had only had 2 owners, the first owner bought it brand new in 1996 and drove it EVERYWHERE for vacations, ect.... He sold it a year or two ago to his neighbor and I bought it from him last year. I would recommend this car to people who need a inexpensive car that will be quality. If you are looking for one, try to get one with the 2.4 engine, STEER CLEAR OF THE 3100 ENGINE VERSIONS PLEASE!!! This was a well built car from Buick with a mid-size body but the comfort of their big sedans. Ice cold AC and very hot heater! It was also the bottom of the line for Buick, which is impressive considering how nice it is for its class!

Value
5.0
Performance
4.0
Quality
5.0
Comfort
4.0
Reliability
4.0
Styling
4.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
6
3

Bnreggie
11/18/2015
Great car overall
Pros

Speedy. Reliable. Cost effective

Cons

Can be a little tight. Some electricals

I bought this car in June of 2014 with 178000 miles. The first thing I had to fix was a wheel bearing. (30$ total) Since the just general maintenance. I have the peppy 3.1l which is stuffed into a car that is really light for the power it produces. I've smoked a couple of so called "sports" cars thinking "oh it's a Buick". Too bad for them. I am a loyal GM man.

Value
5.0
Performance
4.0
Quality
5.0
Comfort
5.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
5.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
7
5

K-dogg
3/2/2015
Good car for the money
Pros

Affordable, comfortable, smooth driver, decent mpg

Cons

Bad head gasket, slow, low to ground

I bough this car in 2008 with 69000 miles for under two grand. I have had to replace the starter once, the muffler a couple of times, the coil pack and the brake lines (that was pricey). The power window motors are sometimes a little iffy but I've never had to replace any of them. Other than that it has been a tremendous vehicle, I have never had to worry about it breaking down or not starting. The interior isn't fancy but I like it and the seats are comfortable. It doesn't accelerate fast but it handles very well. It sits fairly low to the ground so you have to watch out for steep driveways and the like. This car is notorious for having bad head gaskets which usually renders the car useless somewhere between eighty and one-hundred twenty thousand miles. I have actually had the head gasket on my vehicle looked at and they told me it looked fine, so I guess I'm one of the lucky ones. My car has already exceeded its "life expectancy" but I think that's pretty rare. You don't see many on the road any more because of the head gasket problem; that's why I wouldn't recommend the vehicle to anyone else.

Value
5.0
Performance
4.0
Quality
4.0
Comfort
5.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
4.0
Was this review helpful?
21
12

Nick
8/11/2014
best vehicle i ever owned
Pros

easy to drive

Cons

cup holders on glove compartment

gets 31 miles per gal . Interior good . Exterior good . Cracked front fiber glass bumper. Have complete work history on this vehicle

Value
5.0
Performance
5.0
Quality
5.0
Comfort
5.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
4.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
14
10

Vernons
5/4/2014
Very dependable car.
Pros

Very reliable car and good on gas.

Cons

Switches seem to be a common problem.

I have owned my 95 Skylark for 3 years having only to replace a water pump when I first purchased it, ever since I've only had regular maintenance done to it. Very good car for travleing, it has taken me to Las Vegas and San Deigo and I travel to San Bernadina (120 miles round trip) sometimes twice a week. Very good stering and I don't spend a lot on gas. However, my windows switches went out and some of my maintenance lights came on after I had the brakes repaired and the oil changed.

Value
4.0
Performance
5.0
Quality
4.0
Comfort
4.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
5.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
10
5

Skylarky
3/14/2014
Sporty looking exterior!
Pros

good mpg, sporty looking, comfortable, and reliabl

Cons

back seating and trunk could use more space.

I have owned this car for last 9 years and it has been an extremely reliable car. Purchased at 109,000 and currently at 279,000 it still runs smoothly. The biggest downfall with this car is the rear passenger seating. A bit cramped back there if you need any room up front. Otherwise a great looking and smooth running vehicle as long as it is taken care of properly. 28mpg

Value
5.0
Performance
5.0
Quality
5.0
Comfort
4.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
4.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
9
4

Dads
10/25/2012
Wonderful Car
Pros

Great fuel mileage comfortable

Cons

14" tires

Best car we ever owned all the options you'd want. Fully loaded. Great fuel mileage Even for a smaller sedan great value. I'm 6'1" and have plenty of leg room. Drives great and reliable

Value
5.0
Performance
5.0
Quality
5.0
Comfort
5.0
Reliability
5.0
Styling
5.0
Recommends this vehicle
Was this review helpful?
12
7

kbb-logo-mini

Reviews You Can Trust

Kelley Blue Book has been a respected figure in the automotive world since 1926. Our commitment to maintaining this legacy is evident in our Consumer Reviews and Ratings. To ensure our customers receive candid, genuine, and impartial car reviews, we've teamed up with Bazaarvoice, a leader in the industry that employs cutting-edge fraud protection and state-of-the-art protocols to guarantee the authenticity of each review. At Kelley Blue Book, trust is the cornerstone of our relationship with our valued customers, and it’s the guiding principle in everything we do.
Advertisement