To save a ZIP code, allow your browser to accept cookies.

Enter Your ZIP Code

ZIP Code:
Save
ZIP Code Lookup

Why do we need your ZIP code?

Kelley Blue Book® Values and pricing are based in part on transactions in your area. Your ZIP code also helps us find local deals and highlight other available offers.

Advertisement
Please enter a valid 5-digit ZIP code.

Nissan NV200

Nissan NV200

About Nissan NV200

Nissan’s 2016 NV200 is a small cargo van that can carry an impressive amount of goods at a low price. The NV200 is part of a wave of compact cargo vans aimed at businesses and individuals desiring an easy-to-drive, fuel-efficient delivery vehicle. Nissan's compact commercial van scores points in that it's a snap to maneuver, small enough to park in a residential garage, and its blank-space cargo area behind the two front seats is ready for customization. Starting at less than $22,000, the Nissan NV200 is the value player among rivals like the Ford Transit Connect and Ram ProMaster City. But the NV200's lineup is more limited compared to those competitors, and its 4-cylinder engine isn't rated to tow.

Select a Year

(4 available)
2016 Nissan NV200
What's new for 2016?
2016 Nissan NV200

The Nissan NV200 compact cargo van carries over unchanged for the 2016 model year. Though similar in name, the NV200 shouldn't be confused with its huge big brother -- the heavy-duty Nissan NV HD series of cargo and passenger vans.

2015 Nissan NV200
What's new for 2015?
2015 Nissan NV200

The 2015 NV200 Compact Cargo receives a new version of Nissan's Xtronic continuously variable transmission (CVT), an updated navigation and telematics system and revised alternator. New options include a sonar backup-assist system and Sliding Door Glass Package.

2014 Nissan NV200
What's new for 2014?
2014 Nissan NV200

There are no major changes to the 2014 Nissan NV200 compact cargo van.

2013 Nissan NV200
What's new for 2013?
2013 Nissan NV200

The 2013 NV200 is an all-new nameplate in the U.S. market, and will compete directly against the Ram C/V Tradesman and Ford Transit Connect.

Consumer Reviews

Great in everything

By on Sunday, November 3, 2013

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 1,700

10 10.0
overall rating 10 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
10/10
Value
10/10
Reliability
10/10
Quality
10/10
Performance
10/10
Styling
10/10
Comfort
10/10

Pros: "lower price than any cargo van with similer size"

Cons: "No cons sofar"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 10

"With full load and in the city 26.3 MPG. very convenient with 2 sliding doors and back door. Spacious cargo space. Easy to drive in tight areas when delivering. Very low noise for a cargo van. easy to reach anything while standing out side because of the 2 sliding doors and the back door. I love the blue tooth connection to the phone."

22 people out of 29 found this review helpful

Piece of junk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By on Saturday, August 2, 2014

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 25,000

10 1.0
overall rating 1 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
1/10
Value
Not Rated
Reliability
Not Rated
Quality
Not Rated
Performance
Not Rated
Styling
Not Rated
Comfort
Not Rated

Pros: "Gas mileage is good"

Cons: "JUNK!!!!!!!!!"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 1

"Things you should know about the Nissan NV200 before buying one! I have owned this van for about 13 months & have 25,000 miles on it. The suspension bottoms out so easily I have bent all 4 rims @ almost $200.0 each (for plain black rims) & lost all 4 wheel covers. Nissan knows they have a problem because the new VN200 don’t come with full wheel covers any more. I had to replace 2 tires at 18,000 miles because of cupping. Discount Tire said the only reason the tires will cup is because of bad suspension. Nissan said I need to rotate my tires every oil change. The only place you can get the tires is the dealer @ $214.00 each for cheap Continental Tires. At 25,000 I had to replace the other 2 tires because they just worn out. I got 75,000 miles out of the tires on my E150 van. Other problems are the side window is slopped so bad that your arm slides down, sun visor doesn’t cover the top 4 inches of the side window, back up camera only sees the bumper, voice control is very bad, cup holders are too deep, radio changes channels by itself, ABS light & Back door comes on sometimes & gas tank is too small. The blind spot mirror is a joke. This van is the biggest piece of junk man has ever made! I highly recommend you look elsewhere for a good van"

52 people out of 72 found this review helpful

Decent economy Van

By on Tuesday, February 17, 2015

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 16,500

10 8.0
overall rating 8 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
8/10
Value
9/10
Reliability
9/10
Quality
9/10
Performance
7/10
Styling
8/10
Comfort
8/10

Pros: "Good Price, Good Mileage"

Cons: "Poor Handeling at high speeds in wind"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 5

"Having always driven an Astro cargo van, i had my eye on the transit connect for some time, but never really liked it. When the NV 200 came out it seemed to be a better fit for me.-We can argue specs on which is a better van but it really is just personal preference and specific application. Biggest selling points for me were MPG, price and the 60/40 rear door-and interior just "felt better". On the minus side, the sunshades are awkward. they don't extend far enough on the side window and they hang down to much to see through the front window. they don't stay up, had them replaced and the replacements do the same thing. Another downside is its not fun to drive at high speeds when its windy. it gets a bit squirmy. (when its unloaded at least) The cargo area being unfinished (no insulation or coverings) can make the van noisy when it rains. (think tin can) Its an economy van, so power and performance is not going to be one of its strong points-i feel its adequate considering i average 24-25mpg. with lowest mileage recorded at 22.9 and highest at 28.1. Just like any truck, when loaded, there is a decrease in acceleration power and braking distance increases...you just have to drive more carefully. 80% of my driving is little or no load so its fine for my purposes, but if i were to max out the carrying capacity on a regular basis, i may look for a bigger van. The CVT transmission is a bit different from the standard automatic and may take getting used to. Yes there are pros and cons from a technical perspective, but again it comes down to personal preference. Its less "sporty" feeling,(remember its a cargo van) but seems a bit smoother not changing gears all the time. I am neutral on recommending this van. I don't dislike it, but i just recommend if in the market for a cargo van to do your research and get the van that you feel the most comfortable with."

28 people out of 42 found this review helpful

Advertisement
Thanks for Supporting
Kelley Blue Book.
We deliver up-to-date car values, expert reviews and unbiased reporting at no
cost to you. To do this, we display ads from only trusted automotive partners.

To continue on our site, simply turn off your ad blocker and refresh the page.