Used Plymouth Grand Voyager

Select a Year

(9 available)

Narrow year range (drag arrows to filter):

1992
2000

Consumer Reviews

97 Plymouth Voyager

By on Wednesday, December 26, 2007

10 7.0
overall rating 7 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
7/10
Value
8/10
Reliability
8/10
Quality
8/10
Performance
8/10
Styling
9/10
Comfort
9/10

"I bought a 97 Grand Voyager new. In the 10 years I owned it, I only had 3 major problems with it. At 45,000 miles it needed the head gasket replaced. That was covered under warranty and I had no problems with it using or leaking oil after that. At about 110,000 the transmission went out and that was just after the warranty expired. It was like it knew that. That cost about $1,600 to fix and it only lasted the next 90,000 miles and it went out again. That ended my ownership of the vehicle. However, I will say that other than normal wear items such as brakes tires and a few suspension parts, I had trouble free driving for 10 years and 200,000 miles with that van. I would recommend anyone buying one used to double check the transmission history on it and maybe even have a dealer check it out to make sure it has been properly maintained."

18 people out of 18 found this review helpful

"Alright" minivan that could've run with the best

By on Sunday, October 21, 2012

I owned and sold this car
Reason: Upgrade

10 7.0
overall rating 7 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
7/10
Value
8/10
Reliability
5/10
Quality
4/10
Performance
10/10
Styling
10/10
Comfort
10/10

Pros: "Plymouth = Dodge for less $"

Cons: "Low quality,"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 5

"Bought a used 2000 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE in 2006 with 60,000 miles on it. Had more problems getting it from 61,000 to 100,000) than from 101,000 to its current 163,000. Mechanical problems included air conditioning (compressor (twice) and evaporator ($$$)), alternator, starter, tie rods, electrical switches, power windows, and water pump. That said, the 3.3 ran like a bull with great fuel mileage and performance. Body design and interior was simple, very functional, and practical. Like all Chrysler products, quality really fell off when it came to the body. Paint was thin, cheap in appearance and would not hold a shine, the bottoms of all doors suffered from "Chrysler Door Syndrome" (they rotted out), and we went through two sets of OEM driver's side hinges. For the car that defined defined Chrysler, they should've done better."

5 people out of 5 found this review helpful

Bang for the Buck

By on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

I own this car - My approximate mileage is 160,000

10 8.0
overall rating 8 of 10rating details

Reviewer Ratings

Overall Rating
8/10
Value
9/10
Reliability
9/10
Quality
8/10
Performance
8/10
Styling
8/10
Comfort
8/10

Pros: "Value"

Cons: "No frills"

Likely to recommend this car? (1-10): 10

"Great van. I purchased it used with 30k miles on it and 3 years old. I have changed the oil, brakes, wipers, tires, and the thing just keeps on going. If I could keep the body on it I think it might run forever. Probably the most reliable car I have ever owned. The 3.3L is bulletproof."

5 people out of 5 found this review helpful

Advertisement