Based on 621 Ratings for the 1993 - 1997 models.Review this car
By Alfred on Thursday, August 09, 2007
overall rating 9 of 10rating details
"Where do I start with this truck? It's a 94 2.3L/manual trans XLT SuperCab that I picked up from a friend (his dad's company truck) just after spring break 2003...with 209,500 miles on the ticker. I just had a great feeling about this truck as I really needed the extra cab space for my restaurant deliveries. All I have had to do was really one all-out tuneup and a going through of all the brakes. One coil pack went bad and I had to get it swapped to pass emissions, needed a cat converter because of that, a heater core (~30 minute job) and little else other than gas and oil changes. Oh, that driveshaft carrier bearing that grenaded and had the driveshaft flopping around underneath...eh, 279,000 miles or so was a good run for that one. I have had offers to buy this truck and maybe I'd upsize, but I can't find it in myself to do so. It does all I need it to do and it does it well. The trans is solid. No leaks from those rubber plugs near the shifter yet. Did rebuild the bushings, since I knew the one time I could spin the shifter around was not a good thing. Easy job. Engine...all I have owned is 4 cylinders up to my Crown Vic Police Interceptor, so to me the engine is more than adequate for A to B driving. Heck, it still doesn't use a noticeable amount of oil at this point. You just can't be afraid of 4000-5000 RPM shifts, which you'd see if you have a tach cluster (I swapped one in and kept the correct odo reading--easy job). It will peg the speedometer, but won't do it quite as quickly as say a Mustang GT. Oh well. Quality? Eh, mostly hit, but some miss involved. The center armrest? Like almost all the others, cracked in half. Actually, that's about he only thing on this truck that was a miss. No auto trans with the vacuum modulator that goes bad...and destroys the trans. I think the engine is tired, though, so until I start keeping track of fuel consumption again, I don't think it's seeing ~25 MPGs average of days past, but I do drive enough to where it seems it sucks down gas a little more these days when I glance towards the fuel gauge. I think a valve tap is present and some days the truck seems to respond to the GO pedal just a little slower than others. The alignment is off, so I have to check that out as well. All in all, I ignore family when they say I should get a newer Ranger. I don't have to deal with 7-hour heater core changes on the 95-later trucks, I can pull check engine light codes with a couple of paperclips, I don't have the DOOR AJAR problems with the sticking door jamb switches, I don't have the AC vacuum and blend door issues that crop up in the later trucks, nor does the odometer stop working because the cheap plastic gears strip off and although I'd think of swapping a v6 into my truck one day (the v6s do chug some gas, though), the 8 spark plugs on the 4 cylinder aren't that bad to deal with. This has been a tremendous truck. Period. At worst, I use the cop car and rest it some more until I toss another engine in it. I just may keep my promise to drive this one until the wheels literally fall off of it."
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful
By froddo on Tuesday, August 07, 2007
overall rating 10 of 10rating details
"I have had this vehichle for about 3 and a half yeasr and it still runs great. The only this wrong with it is the steering box was knocked out wack when hit by a drunk driver and knocked sidways over a curb."
By nicademus on Monday, August 06, 2007
overall rating 4 of 10rating details
"This year Ranger has it all, BUT beware, all ford rangers will need some tlc in the older years. Everyone I have seen and owned will need a new clutch at 145tho miles, they need new brakes [complete] at 130tho, and a compete tune up every two years. The 1995 model loses power easily uphills, but they do exceed expectations on gas milage, Comfortable cab, nice room in an extended cab. For the mechanic and the backyard mechanic, they are easy to work on, and parts are everywhere. A good truck for under $6000."
1 person out of 1 found this review helpful
By Drew on Tuesday, July 31, 2007
overall rating 8 of 10rating details
"My '95 Ranger XLT Extended Cab has 229,000 miles and is still is good running condition. Besides the usual maintenance, I haven't had much trouble with it. Great for hauling equipment and towing. I would definitely recommend this vehicle to anyone looking for a truck on a budget."
By heathen on Tuesday, July 31, 2007
overall rating 10 of 10rating details
"Very Good Dependable Truck. The 4.0 Engine Is Powerfull /Not so good on gas use"